The case against policy intervention

From the Vancouver Real Estate Anecdote Archive:

At the very most any policy intervention would only forestall the inevitable crash. To cause an ‘orderly unwinding’ of a bubble you require an orderly and never-ending supply of buyers willing to take on large amounts of (albeit cheap) debt to buy assets that are falling in value and still grossly overpriced….

Policy change to prop up the market via new buyers would simply delay and magnify the bust, not resolve it. The pool of people facing certain future financial hardships would grow even larger.

Truer words were never spoken.  When the housing market begins its correction (and many of us believe it already has), the last thing the government should do is try to stem the tide.  It only prolongs the pain, wastes taxpayer money, and rewards those who foolishly bought into the real estate hype.

Deleveraging is inherently a painful process, and the sooner we get it over with, the better.

Chris Matthews on Obama’s State of the Union Address: “I Forgot He Was Black”

Am I the only one who isn’t shocked and offended that Chris Matthews forgot Obama was black during the State of the Union address?

There is a racial divide in America; just look at what a big deal it was for a black man to be elected president in the first place. At least Chris Matthews doesn’t have his head in the sand about it. Inadvertently or not, he revealed what was going on in his mind, and possibly in the minds of other Americans of his generation, and it was a positive shift in thinking. Let’s not chastise him for it.